THE WORLD TODAY IS A SAFER PLACE THAN IT WAS A HUNDRED YEARS AGO, AND GOVERNMENT SHOULD STOP SPENDING LARGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY ON THEIR ARMED FORCES. To what extent do you agree

It is often believed that the
government
should reduce investment in armed forces
due to
the improvement of safety in modern life from a hundred years ago. I partially agree with
this
, for the general promotion of
peace
around the world regardless of some deadly conflicts that still take place, making it important for the authorities to spend
money
on armies for protection. On the one hand, the larger amount of
money
spent by the
government
is no longer necessary with the increasing awareness toward
peace
in current societies.
In other words
, there are a number of acts to promote harmony and cooperation as
people
come to accept their differences to respect each other.
For instance
, an international festival called "nagomu" has been held in Kanagawa in Japan since 1998 to encourage
people
to participate in traditional events where they can learn unique fashions
as well as
cuisines of diverse cultures.
Therefore
, the fact that many
people
tend to regard national differences as something positive and stimulating through
such
opportunities will reduce the role of militaries in the future.
On the other hand
, the
government
is still expected to spend a large amount of
money
to conquer the growing tensions between different nations. Indeed, there is a rising sense of insecurity as
people
face numerous global issues which include the accelerating depletion of natural fuels and food resources
as well as
the rising global temperatures and expansion of deserts.
Furthermore
, these problems lead to the poverty of many
people
and frequent international conflicts, causing more deaths and injuries.
Thus
, the
government
's ability to battle against other countries to protect the safety and
peace
of the citizens should be well maintained, making the investment significant. In conclusion, I somewhat agree that the incredible amount of
money
for armies is not necessary as more
people
have a shared view of
peace
and cooperation.
However
, the greater possibilities for war in the severe situations on Earth make the investment important.
Submitted by mizuho on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
To further strengthen the essay, make sure all arguments consistently tie back to the main thesis. For instance, the discussion of global warming and desert expansion should more clearly explain how they directly correlate to the need for military spending.
task achievement
Make sure to elaborate on specific points with more depth. For example, detailing how the international festival in Japan leads to more significant peace beyond cultural understanding can provide stronger support for your argument.
coherence cohesion
Improve sentence variety and reduce wordiness in some areas to maintain clarity and reader engagement. For instance, instead of repeating 'large amount of money,' consider synonyms or rephrasing.
general positive
The essay is well-crafted and offers a balanced perspective, showcasing both sides of the argument effectively.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion effectively frame the discussion, making it easy to follow the main points.
task achievement
The use of specific examples, such as the 'nagomu' festival in Japan, enhances the argument and provides concrete support.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • International Diplomacy
  • United Nations
  • pandemics
  • socioeconomic improvements
  • literacy rates
  • economic development
  • social stability
  • military expenditure
  • deterrent
  • cyber-attacks
  • terrorism
  • biological warfare
  • critical areas
  • well-rounded approach
  • prosperous society
What to do next:
Look at other essays: