Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet, and they can get study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that

schools

are no longer initial because

children

are able to learn through the huge amount of information on the Internet, and they can study by themselves at home. I strongly disagree with

this

viewpoint.

To begin

with, the information on the Internet is mostly not selective, some are

also

not suitable for

children

. Enhancing non-selective knowledge might lead

children

to misunderstand and learn in an unsystematic way. To illustrate

this

, there is some evidence that

children

are affected negatively by misinformation and engage in violent, age-inappropriate behaviour.

As a result

,

children

can be psychologically vulnerable, and at risk of harming those around them and themselves.

In addition

,

schools

play a crucial role in our society and can not be replaced no matter what because it not only the place educating and helping

children

acquire knowledge selectively and systematically, but

also

supporting kids in learning how to behave properly and get on well with people throughout the interaction with teachers and their friends.

For example

,

children

can be educated on how to treat people around them politely, how to make new friends and the way they should work in groups through some activities organised by the teacher.

Subsequently

, plenty of interaction might help kids enjoy their studies,

then

easily not only learn a great deal of knowledge but

also

improve their mindset.

To sum up

, there is no doubt that

schools

are immensely important because of their educational role. I believe that claiming

schools

are not irrelevant to

children

's learning is merely absurd.