Some people believe that the extinction of animal species is a natural process and humans should not intervene. Do you agree or disagree?

Some individuals consider that the dead livestock varieties are naturally processed

as well as

the community needs to not interfere with them. Undoubtedly, I do disagree with the view that a community can not protect the environment without living things being extinct. Fortunately, the issue can be solved by humans' actions, if the living

animals

are living in zoos,

then

it is not so dangerous. They can

also

exist in huge forests as they are wild living things ,

however

, in the world, there are some rare

animals

which are at risk. In order to save their generations, wildlife scientists and biologists should keep them in specific places,

such

as reserved zoos in a large bordered territory out of the city. Especially, far away from ambitious those who may be interested in hunting them. Briefly, people must not ruin the

last

generations of unique wild living stuff.

Instead

, they should assist to outnumber them.

Furthermore

,

animals

are various and most of them are endangered livestock

that is

extinct. They are not actually natural processes but are caused by the deforestation of forests and reducing the trees.

As a result

,

animals

are becoming extinct and few of them are alive.

For instance

, if there are no trees and green areas, humans

also

can not live long as growing living things need

this

, because greenhouses support all alive existence that gives fresh air to exist in life.

Therefore

, the population who are responsible for the environment should diminish deforestation to get the safety of existence. In conclusion, I absolutely disagree with

this

statement because it shows several positions of extinct animal species as a natural action. Clearly, many folks can prevent the extinction of species.