world history suggests that violence and the conflict where more evident under men leadership than a female leadership.so for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership.what are your opinion on the above topic?
In recent years, a debate regarding
leadership
positions
emerged. In particular
, some people argue that since the greatest conflicts took place under male leadership
putting more women in power
positions
could help maintain peace
. In my opinion, this
view is skewed by the fact that the majority of leaders
are men, and, in this
essay, I will explain why.
It is undoubtedly true that the most violent events in human history occurred when men were in power
positions
, and someone could say that this
demonstrates that male leadership
is detrimental to peace
. Conversely
, a possible counterargument is that maybe other factors, such
as political views can influence the propension
to violence. Correct your spelling
propensity
However
, this
is not true, because leaders
of opposite sides recurred in
Correct your spelling
an
asimilar
extent to brutality to affirm their Correct your spelling
a similar
similar
power
. For instance
, Hitler and Stalin were conceptually at the antipodes nonetheless
they caused millions of deaths during their regimes, using the same strategies to maintain their positions
. Therefore
, it could be not entirely inaccurate to say that female leaders
are a better option for peace
.
On the other hand
, it has to be noted that in world history there were many more male leaders
than female leaders
, thus
this
can cause some misvaluations. While
it is true that there are plenty of examples of pacifist female leaders
, such
as peace
Nobel prize-winner Myanmar's president Aung San Suu-Ki, there also
were women who used violence to the same extent as their men counterparts. For example
, under Margaret Tatcher's
presidency, the UK started the Falkland war against Argentina. Another female brutal leader was Catherine the Great of Russia, known for her strict monarchy. Correct your spelling
Thatcher's
According to
these examples, there were more instances of conflicts under male rule only because generally there was
more males in Change the verb form
were
power
.
In conclusion, it can be stated that there are no significant differences in male or female leadership
regarding peace
. In fact, there are many examples on both sides of peaceful leaders
and of more violent ones. Hence
the real difference is made by the personality of the people in power
positions
and not their gender.Submitted by formaggio124 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.