world history suggests that violence and the conflict where more evident under men leadership than a female leadership.so for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership.what are your opinion on the above topic?

In recent years, a debate regarding
leadership
positions
emerged.
In particular
, some people argue that since the greatest conflicts took place under male
leadership
putting more women in
power
positions
could help maintain
peace
. In my opinion,
this
view is skewed by the fact that the majority of
leaders
are men, and, in
this
essay, I will explain why. It is undoubtedly true that the most violent events in human history occurred when men were in
power
positions
, and someone could say that
this
demonstrates that male
leadership
is detrimental to
peace
.
Conversely
, a possible counterargument is that maybe other factors,
such
as political views can influence the
propension
Correct your spelling
propensity
to violence.
However
,
this
is not true, because
leaders
of opposite sides recurred
in
Correct your spelling
an
show examples
asimilar
Correct your spelling
a similar
similar
extent to brutality to affirm their
power
.
For instance
, Hitler and Stalin were conceptually at the antipodes
nonetheless
they caused millions of deaths during their regimes, using the same strategies to maintain their
positions
.
Therefore
, it could be not entirely inaccurate to say that female
leaders
are a better option for
peace
.
On the other hand
, it has to be noted that in world history there were many more male
leaders
than female
leaders
,
thus
this
can cause some misvaluations.
While
it is true that there are plenty of examples of pacifist female
leaders
,
such
as
peace
Nobel prize-winner Myanmar's president Aung San Suu-Ki, there
also
were women who used violence to the same extent as their men counterparts.
For example
, under Margaret
Tatcher's
Correct your spelling
Thatcher's
presidency, the UK started the Falkland war against Argentina. Another female brutal leader was Catherine the Great of Russia, known for her strict monarchy.
According to
these examples, there were more instances of conflicts under male rule only because generally there
was
Change the verb form
were
show examples
more males in
power
. In conclusion, it can be stated that there are no significant differences in male or female
leadership
regarding
peace
. In fact, there are many examples on both sides of peaceful
leaders
and of more violent ones.
Hence
the real difference is made by the personality of the people in
power
positions
and not their gender.
Submitted by formaggio124 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: