world history suggests that violence and the conflict where more evident under men leadership than a female leadership.so for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership.what are your opinion on the above topic?

In recent years, a debate regarding

leadership

positions

emerged.

In particular

, some people argue that since the greatest conflicts took place under male

leadership

putting more women in

power

positions

could help maintain

peace

. In my opinion,

this

view is skewed by the fact that the majority of

leaders

are men, and, in

this

essay, I will explain why. It is undoubtedly true that the most violent events in human history occurred when men were in

power

positions

, and someone could say that

this

demonstrates that male

leadership

is detrimental to

peace

.

Conversely

, a possible counterargument is that maybe other factors,

such

as political views can influence the

propension

Correct your spelling

propensity

to violence.

However

,

this

is not true, because

leaders

of opposite sides recurred

in

Correct your spelling

an

show examples

asimilar

Correct your spelling

a similar

similar

extent to brutality to affirm their

power

.

For instance

, Hitler and Stalin were conceptually at the antipodes

nonetheless

they caused millions of deaths during their regimes, using the same strategies to maintain their

positions

.

Therefore

, it could be not entirely inaccurate to say that female

leaders

are a better option for

peace

.

On the other hand

, it has to be noted that in world history there were many more male

leaders

than female

leaders

,

thus

this

can cause some misvaluations.

While

it is true that there are plenty of examples of pacifist female

leaders

,

such

as

peace

Nobel prize-winner Myanmar's president Aung San Suu-Ki, there

also

were women who used violence to the same extent as their men counterparts.

For example

, under Margaret

Tatcher's

Correct your spelling

Thatcher's

presidency, the UK started the Falkland war against Argentina. Another female brutal leader was Catherine the Great of Russia, known for her strict monarchy.

According to

these examples, there were more instances of conflicts under male rule only because generally there

was

Change the verb form

were

show examples

more males in

power

. In conclusion, it can be stated that there are no significant differences in male or female

leadership

regarding

peace

. In fact, there are many examples on both sides of peaceful

leaders

and of more violent ones.

Hence

the real difference is made by the personality of the people in

power

positions

and not their gender.