Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that rich

countries

ought to provide humanitarian support when natural disasters happen in less affluent nations.

This

essay agrees with

this

statement because owing to

this

aid the

country

that suffers from disaster can supply the population with the goods and medicines for their existence,

also

less-fortunate

countries

do not have the financial power to stand up by themselves.

To begin

with, it is obvious that people could not have enough facilities when urgent situations occur like disasters.

This

means they would not be able to take medical treatment and suffer from insufficient products. In order to avoid unhappy scenarios the nation should take proper treatment and wealthier

countries

can help them in

this

situation, because poor

countries

do not have enough finance to provide

this

help.

For example

, when the earthquakes happened in Syria in February 2023, many rich nations sent them financial support and humanitarian relief, so people in

this

country

can use these goods that are not available at that moment.

Secondly

, the poorer nation would not be able to re-establish themselves as they do not have sufficient profit. If the wealthier

country

provides

this

type of help, the less affluent

country

has more chances to rebuild faster.

Moreover

, thanks to the help of the privileged

countries

the infrastructure of a developing

country

can be processed immediately.

For instance

, the USA helped Japan when the tsunami covered some of the main cities of Japan and after less amount of time Japan was able to show its rebuilt buildings. In conclusion, wealthy

countries

should help the less privileged nations when a catastrophe happened in order to ensure the fast development of the suffering

country

and its nations’ necessities.