The popularity of news media often has significant influence on people’s lives. Some people believe this to be a negative development. Do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, a debate regarding the effect of
news
media
on the population has emerged.
In particular
, some
people
argue that publishing nowadays has an exaggerated influence on others' lives and that
this
is negative. In my opinion,
this
point of view is true and the growing popularity of these forms of information poses a risk to society. In
this
essay, a brief explanation regarding the matter will be given. It is undoubtedly true that growing exposure to
news
can be positive for
people
. In fact, it could be said that modern-day society is the most informed one in history, spreading more and more
awareness
Replace the word
aware
show examples
of many situations among the population.
As a consequence
,
people
now have much more knowledge of arguments that could impact their life.
For instance
, the recent inflation wave could be predicted, by
people
listening to these transmissions, before it happened. Given all
this
, it is not entirely inaccurate to affirm that the popularity of
news
media
has been a positive development.
On the other hand
, the quality of
this
news
should be considered
while
judging the phenomenon.
Whereas
the population is surely more informed,
this
information is often biased and inaccurate.
As a result
, it can be difficult to comprehend which source of knowledge is reliable and which is not.
Furthermore
, much of the
news
passed by these
media
are
Correct subject-verb agreement
is
show examples
merely opinions used to push a specific political agenda, creating factions among the
people
. For all these reasons, the widespread diffusion of
news
media
has impaired the critical capacity of
people
, who are more and more prone to totally rely on what they hear and fight each other over some minor argument. In conclusion, I think that
this
development is negative for society. As stated above, not only
people
are losing their capacity to elaborate critical information, but
also
less prone to hear different opinions. During the
last
years, these detrimental effects could be seen when
people
antagonized each other during the Trump administration.
As a result
,
this
phenomenon should be limited, before it has some serious consequences.
Submitted by formaggio124 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • manipulation
  • bias
  • sensationalism
  • misinformation
  • unwarranted
  • suppress
  • critical thinking
  • democratic participation
  • social justice
  • reforms
  • accessibility
  • informed populace
  • engaged
  • counter
  • wholly
  • negative impact
What to do next:
Look at other essays: