Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others belive that some imformation is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In

this

modern world, the manners of communicating and sharing state-of-the-art

information

and data, have become a subject of debate among people. Some people opine that

information

on various subjects should be widespread,

while

others including me, hold the view that charge fewer researches sharing should be restricted. In the paragraphs to come,

this

essay shall explain both schools of thought and put forth my perspective on

this

phenomenon. In some person’s view, sharing

research

widely has two important benefits.

Firstly

this

could create an opportunity for communities to

level

up their awareness of different subjects. Should individuals be able to search for their issues on academic

research

engines freely, they would be able to increase their knowledge and promote their

level

of education no matter how their

level

of budget is.

Furthermore

, companies and industries would be able to make more profit.

This

is because they could reach up-to-date

research

at no charge.

Consequently

, they save money on

this

and invest more

on

Change preposition

in

show examples

advertising and their products efficiently to

sells

Wrong verb form

sell

show examples

more.

Hence

free access to

information

create an environment in which both individuals and industries can earn advantages. In a stark paradox to

this

, others propound that sharing essential

research

with fee has two considerable points in terms of

research

groups’ activity and security. At

first,

should all the

research

and outcomes of the

research

groups publish freely, scientists’ enthusiasm for developing the academic world would decrease.

This

is because they spend the majority of their life working on projects and

research

and they deserve the financial outcome of their activities

besides

the scientific aspect to not become disappointed. In terms of the latter one, reporting all the critical

information

in scientific

research

could lead to dangerous accidents.

For instance

, introducing new methods of manufacturing special drugs which can use to meditate and sedate humans, gives somebodies the opportunity of abusing

this

information

with the aim of

suiside

Correct your spelling

suicide

.

This

is too simplistic to ignore

this

negative impact on the security

level

of societies.

Therefore

, limiting free access to vital

information

in any field is highly beneficial in the long term run in the world. In conclusion,

although

sharing and communicating

information

in

this

developed era considering a vital part of our lives, the negative effect of free access to all types of

information

should not be ignored. And I am totally in the second position.