The government should sometimes infringe on people’s freedom for the security of society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is sometimes argued that individuals’

freedom

has to be regulated by the

government

if it is inevitable.

Although

some people are worried about the invasion of

freedom

, I firmly believe that

freedom

could be intervened by the

government

for several reasons.

To begin

with, individuals have the right to live safely

as well as

freely. As they are eager to behave in their own ways, there are possibilities that they could hurt others or deprive their

freedom

.

For example

, because everyone is not able to afford designer bags, someone who cannot buy them is willing to steal them. Even though the person has his or her right to do whatever they want, it should be prohibited by the

government

in order to protect others’ property. On top of that, the

government

should keep society stable.

While

it is quite concerning that a few countries discourage their citizens’

freedom

for

this

reason, society’s order needs to be followed under the

government

’s control at some point.

For instance

, drivers are often tempted to drive after drinking. If we regard people’s

freedom

as the top priority, we have to let them drive under influence.

However

, unlikely

this

perspective, the

government

ought to restrict them for others’ safety and traffic rules. In conclusion, despite the belief that people’s

freedom

cannot be restricted by the

government

, it could be controlled for the safety and security of society when it is needed. For those reasons, it seems clear that the

government

should sometimes regulate individuals’

freedom

for a stable and sound society.