Both government and individual are spending vast amount of money protecting animals and their habitats. This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and healthcare. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays

people

spend

money

for different purposes. Some

people

argue that the

government

and the public are consuming a large proportion of the

budget

on animal and natural environment safety,

while

others believe that

this

amount of

money

should be spent on social problems like

poverty

and

healthcare

. I accept that

government

and individuals should spend

money

on animal conservation and living area. Yet I believe that dealing with

poverty

and

healthcare

is another mandatory issue to have the

budget

for them. On the one hand, in today's world develop countries care caring too much about

animals

in different ways. For ,

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

example most

people

keep

animals

as a pet in their houses and fed them regularly, where they spent their

budget

on

animals

.

However

,

this

movement from the public will help to decrease environmental pollution

as well as

the

government

economically.

Furthermore

, every state should spend

money

on environmental betterness , which will ensure the life of

animals

and

people

.

On the other hand

, most countries are facing

poverty

and

healthcare

in their society and public.

Furthermore

dealing with these issues is the responsibility of the

government

to have a complete

budget

for it to fight these problems. In ,addition every state which has the best plan and

Money

for

poverty

and

healthcare

are completely developed country and they are with other problems within their country. In conclusion, we should care for and spend

money

on

animals

and nature, so it doesn't mean that we would not have a

Budget

for

poverty

and

healthcare

which are the main problem in society.