Creative artists should always be given freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Art

and culture have a crucial place in human civilization.

However

, some people argue that creative

artists

should be given the freedom to express their emotions and thoughts through words, pictures, music or film without the interference of governmental restrictions.

While

this

might be beneficial for them to improve their creativity, I totally disagree with

this

idea for some reasons that will be set out below.

Firstly

, by letting the

artists

express themselves without any governmental interference, some of them may become irresponsible to violate moral values, which they express through inappropriate forms of

art

,

such

as cruelty and nudity. The existence of

such

artists

with disturbing

art

styles cannot be overlooked, as it may lead to various problems in society.

For instance

, in its implementation, cruel action movies and pornography are most likely to be consumed by children on the internet if the government does not apply restrictions in the form of publication law.

Besides

, making no restrictions on the

artists

means that they are free to publish various forms of

art

that contain fake information or hate speeches which is disadvantageous for the safety of the country.

For example

, novelists who are not allowed to write about political issues in their novels might create a sarcastic cartoon about a specific person that they dislike in a presidential election, which might affect public perceptions towards that particular person. In conclusion, the government should apply laws which control the content made by the

artists

in order to prevent the creation of any piece of

art

that may violate societal norms and stop the spread of hate speeches and false information.