Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease, governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollution and housing problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
People find themselves at loggerheads regarding the issue of whether administrators should struggle with environmental and residential circumstances to win the battle against illness. Personally, I believe that parts of the above statement are sound, but not totally compelling for the following reasons.
On the one hand, alleviating environmental destruction could interrupt the transmission of
disease
. Cleanliness and hygiene are guarantees of individual health, which could interpret
why plenty of diseases are widely spread in areas with dirty surroundings, Verb problem
explain
such
as slums, gutters, or small sewage-ridden. On top of that, ameliorating accommodation conditions is beneficial to hamper the transmission of disease
. For instance
, during the covid
period, it has been proven that the infection rate in areas with better housing standards is lower than in crowded spaces, for sufficient spaces are necessary for isolation, Correct your spelling
COVID
therefore
steering clear of the disease
hazard. Thus
, investment in environmental protection and accommodation is indispensable for hampering illness.
On the other hand
, pumping funds into environmental protection and building construction could merely address public health problems in a relatively indirect way. With the aim of reducing disease
, what governments should do first is to subsidize scientific and medical research. Vaccines, targeted drugs, and specific therapies are dominantly pivotal facets to
combat Change preposition
of
disease
, which are utterly based on experimental research. For instance
, the reason why human beings could defeat malaria is the discovery and in-depth medical research of the pathogen and medical treatment. By contrast
, fighting pollution costs
much time to overcome the Verb problem
takes
disease
problem. To sum up
, administrative departments should seek other directly efficient solutions to address diseases.
To conclude
, from where I stand, improving environmental and residential conditions is essential, but authorities should also
give financial support to medical subjects that are targeted at resolving public illness problems or so.Submitted by yuetongli98 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that your examples align specifically with the arguments you present. Maintain a clear connection between your examples and the perspectives you present.
task achievement
Ensure that your ideas directly address the task question. Use examples and explanations that are directly relevant to the topic.