Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

People think that the secret life details of political leaders should not be released in
news
Correct article usage
the news
show examples
. I totally disagree, as they are role models for society,
however
, some personal space is everybody's right.
Considering one
Verb problem
One
show examples
of the reasons behind the publications of intimate life stories of political figures is their role as arbiters in ordinary man’s life. They think they are the best chosen among them
,
Correct word choice
and, therefore
show examples
therefore
, heroes of the nation.
For example
, Barack Obama was frequently caught by the media
while
he was out of his office and was admired for his humbled and behaviour with his family, in routine activities and interactions. He never took advantage of being President of the country
Moreover
, another reason for transparency is that society thinks that
this
can prevent
such
personalities from corruption, briberies and immoralities being afraid of always into the limelight.
For instance
, a bunch of political parties have made secret assets in Pakistan from money illegally that a poor had paid from his limited income.
Consequently
, these governmental personalities have lost trust in them
On the other hand
, having privacy is every human being's right and politics-related people
also
deserve that.
Therefore
, they should be publicised for their work as leaders or services not what they do in their free time. In conclusion, I believe the opposite view of the statement that there should be broadcasting of private activities of political folks
due to
the fact they can be an inspiration for the youth,
as well as
such
publications make things more realistic and lucid but again
this
should have certain limits.
Submitted by ridanaheed03 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Ensure that your essay directly addresses the prompt and presents a clear opinion. Discuss both sides of the issue, offering balanced arguments for and against the publication of private details of political leaders.
coherence and cohesion
Your essay has a clear introduction and conclusion. However, improve the logical progression of ideas within paragraphs and link your supporting points more effectively.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • intrusion
  • accountability
  • transparency
  • sensationalism
  • privacy
  • public interest
  • collateral damage
  • precedent
  • responsible journalism
  • exploitation
  • democratic processes
  • media culture
  • balance
What to do next:
Look at other essays: