Some believe that new science related to criminal forensics should be used to look at old cases. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is sometimes argued whether newly discovered technologies that relate to criminal forensics ought to be used to re-check old occurrences or not. In my opinion, I completely agree with the view that using scientific equipment to find out the facts in the past,
which
Correct pronoun usage
apply
show examples
might have some advantages that I am going to mention. One of the most important advantages that I realize is that modern technological advances help to seek fairness in accidents. To be more specific, if some argumentative incidents in the past had not had expected results, the justice system could utilize many techniques related to criminal forensics to re-examine and get the obvious evidence.
This
means individuals who had unfair consequences could have more likelihood to obtain the refund that they deserved.
Furthermore
, people tend to have a friendly view with clearness, which makes them feel satisfied to accept past accidents.
Thus
, the government should encourage law offices to maximize the productivity of using high-tech devices to examine each of the unfortunate occasions Another reason why I believe it is useful is that forensic science can assist to reduce crime rates. Specifically, in the past, there
was
Correct subject-verb agreement
were
show examples
a number of offenders selling and purchasing drugs and
due to
the lack of modern technologies, the government had difficulty
in
Change preposition
apply
show examples
punishing them.
However
, recently, there are lots of new inventions
such
as blood stain analysis, and fingerprint analysis that help to carry out investigations effectively.
As a result
, some criminal drug groups not detected many years ago have been severely fined. In conclusion, I wholeheartedly agree that forensic science plays a vital role in re-examining old occasions to seek justice.
Submitted by jakedth162 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • forensics
  • accuracy
  • guilt
  • innocence
  • uncovering
  • evidence
  • investigation
  • analysis
  • reliability
  • ethical concerns
  • high costs
  • re-evaluating
What to do next:
Look at other essays: