Some think that people should not change their jobs while others think they should because it brings advantages for themselves, company and society. Discuss and give opinion.

There is a view that staying at one job can bring many significant long-term

benefits

for self, organizations and society,

however

, some counter recommendations have been made too. I would support the latter view, but

this

essay will discuss both views in detail. On one hand, being a part of one company for a long time may help a person understand the culture of the organization more accurately, which makes him more productive within a defined work setting.

Moreover

, a company can

also

put trust in someone who stays longer in it,

thus

, investing more in his training and career development.

Furthermore

, at the time of retirement, a more senior

employee

will get higher

benefits

.

For example

, a senior

employee

gets more long-term

benefits

in many multi-national organizations,

such

as PNG group, where higher designations are filled with senior employees internally, and, on their retirement, they get

benefits

based on their designations and a number of working years with the company. On other hand, switching companies may give an

employee

more exposure to new areas and,

thus

, better learning and salary. When human resources learn fast, they become the more skilled workforce in society,

hence

, organizations within those societies may grow faster, and expand their workforce by getting the maximum

benefits

from skilled labours.

For instance

,

according to

a research work, published by a professional at an American university, an

employee

who switches more, develops more skills and receives higher pay.

To conclude

, there are some pros and cons of switching employers throughout a career. It is good for new skills and career development, but slows down the process of recognition, and decreases after-employment rewards.