In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In
this
fast-paced world, many individuals believe that there should be major investments in the railway sector to build infrastructure supporting very fast trains. On the opposite side, others suggest improving the existing transportation
system
. In my opinion, setting up fast train tracks is the better alternative.
Therefore
,
this
issue needs
further
discussion.
To begin
with, many people believe that investing in fast trains leads to growth in our economy and tourism. If the travel time for logistics reduces, railways can handle more freight to earn higher profits.
Moreover
, tourists prefer to save their precious time by travelling in faster trains.
For instance
, The Bullet train in Japan and Vande Bharat in India have transformed the
transport
sector.
On the other hand
, others believe in improving the existing public
transport
because it involves less expenditure. Improving the existing
system
needs less capital and time.
For example
, Japan allocates a major portion of its
transport
budget to improve the existing
system
and only allocates the remaining funds to new rail lines. In my opinion, building faster train lines can lead to better socio-economic advantages.
This
investment will create more jobs, improve our freight handling
system
and reduce the traffic congestion on roads.
However
, we need to allocate a fixed proportion of funds to maintain the present structures.
This
has been clearly reflected in India’s recent rail budget.
Hence
, both concepts go hand-in-hand.
To conclude
, fast mobility
transport
can improve growth and tourism
whereas
it is equally important to maintain and improve the existing transportation.
Overall
, governments can choose to maintain a healthy balance between these two concepts.
Submitted by adityabawa66 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: