The detailed description about crime will affect the people and cause many social problems. Some people say that the media should be strictly controlled. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a controversial perspective heating up a debate over whether it is necessary to strictly

control

the specific description of wicked acts. I consider myself an advocate of the opinion that

crime

information should not be released. Without a shadow of a doubt, controlling the

media

is of significance. The reason that lawbreakers who commit a serious

crime

Fix the agreement mistake

crimes

show examples

can be considered a threat to the whole society, providing information about them can help citizens protect themselves better and avoid unexpected dangerous situations.

For example

, the Vietnamese government offers residents accurate and useful pieces of personal information about criminals, especially offenders who commit serious wicked acts.

Therefore

, the

media

should not be under

control

.

While

the essence of publishing

crime

descriptions is widely acknowledged, it is unfair if the importance of managing

media

is ignored. On the grounds that when the details of the

crime

are published, it may bring negative impacts on adolescents who are likely to imitate wicked acts blindly. As they are curious about how illegal

crime

is convicted, they tend to imitate neither misdemeanours nor fatal felonies which can do harm to other innocent people. Sexual assault, kidnapping, murdering or consuming drugs can be cited as outstanding examples of serious felonies which were caused by young people.

Hence

, keeping the press under

control

should be taken into account.

To sum up

,

while

the importance of controlling the

media

is valid to some extent, I think it is optimal that the press should be strictly under

control

.