Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Helping undeveloped

countries

is a way of embodying international obligations.

However

, some people argue that giving

money

directly to those nations is not an effective method to cope with poverty. In my view, I am in favour of

this

statement because providing technological and educational assistance is more important than

money

for their development.

First,

it is not to say that

money

is not vital for developing a country, but essential that

money

should be earned by the

countries

themselves. To accomplish

this

goal, developed

countries

can provide a way how to establish sustainable systems

such

as education. To be precise, building some campuses and sending teachers to poor

countries

can help them to set up a good education

system

which can produce high achievers in many academic fields.

For example

, a finance student can

finally

give back to their hometown, developing the local economy.

Second,

besides

building colleges, other infrastructures are

also

crucial for improving the living standard of those

countries

. A reliable transport

system

can introduce a strong and firm foundation that makes a country develop its economy smoothly.

For example

, a missive railway

system

is helpful to transport a huge number of people and commodities to other places. Experienced engineers and construction workers can be sent to support and give opinions to them to build

this

system

. Not only can

this

action increase the activity of commercial events, but ,in doing so, it can

also

enhance the country's comprehensive strength. In summary, giving

money

is not a realistic method to deal with poverty, but teaching them how to earn

money

is a true path to success.