People nowadays have been arguing nations ought to not meddle as much in the internal affairs of other nations. I strongly agree
due to
several considerations in which to maintain the relationship between both countries and yet, Linking Words
one
country can interfere with the inner workings of others if there is harm toward itself.
Use synonyms
First,
meddling with Linking Words
one
state beyond the covenant runs the risk of breaking a harmonic relationship. Everyone is conscious every nation has its own regulations which their government has deemed to be better for citizens. Use synonyms
For instance
, it would be inappropriate for Malaysia to intervene constantly in India if it did to promote the welfare of Indian citizens, as it would violate Indian sovereignty. Linking Words
Therefore
, to maintain two countries' partnerships, a state should not have a significant role in other domestic deals.
Linking Words
In contrast
, if there is a reason which harms the state itself, a country can interfere heavily in the affairs of others. Linking Words
This
is done to defend its own Linking Words
interest
, Fix the agreement mistake
interests
such
as defence, and economy. Linking Words
For example
, China's economy Linking Words
is
impacted when the US imposed an energy embargo on Russia. Wrong verb form
was
Then
, it makes sense for China to meddle as it needs to protect its own Linking Words
asset
because failing to do so will enable the currency to fluctuate. Fix the agreement mistake
assets
Thus
, Linking Words
one
nation can intervene more because it needs to secure its own region.
Use synonyms
To sum up
, I agree a country should interfere less with others to preserve their friendship, which can be used in the future. Linking Words
However
, it is acceptable for Linking Words
one
nation to interfere a lot if there is a threat.Use synonyms
farahhuzaimee