Some people think people should be given the right to use freshwater as they like. Others believe governments should strictly control the use of freshwater. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

It is debatable whether clean

water

should be freely utilized by citizens or should be stringently supervised. From my perspective, both arguments are valid to a certain extent, but I am still in favour of the latter in wake of the environment and lives of individuals. The following paragraphs would shed light on my viewpoint. Admittedly, advocates of

this

first standpoint have their rational ground.

First,

the

use

of potable

water

is essential to maintain the life of residents. To be specific, when they have the right in using clean

water

,

this

resource ensures safety for them in daily activities. In fact, in the coastal areas of VietNam, a significant number of civilians suffer from venereal diseases

due to

the frequent

use

of squalid

water

.

Second,

pure

water

plays an important role in manufacturing agriculture.

In particular

, citizens require the

use

of guaranteed

water

to plant trees and aquaculture. In the long term,

this

would help elevate productivity and create a stable income for residents. Despite the valid arguments detailed above, I still believe that

this

action provides merits. The most pertinent point is that unpolluted

water

is a precious and increasingly scarce resource. To elaborate, maintaining tight restrictions helps preserve pristine

water

, which is used for the right purpose. In the long run,

this

protects said resource

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and ameliorates the quality of life of the community. Another justification is that the combination between the legal bodies and businesses could upgrade infrastructure in progressing

water

as well as

creating commodities and services related to

water

. Specifically, firms would construct green buildings to curtail prodigality and polluted

water

. In reality, Nestle Vietnam, which is a mineral

water

company, has expanded cooperation with the purpose of regenerating local

water

ecosystems. In conclusion, it is disputable that individuals would have autonomy in personal care and agriculture when they have the right to

use

fresh

water

.

Nonetheless

, I still strongly agree with the second argument in question thanks to its conductive impacts on the life and surroundings of citizens.