There is a lot of pressure on young people today to succeed academically. As a result, some people believe that non-academic subjects, such as physical education and cookery, should be removed from the school syllabus so that children can concentrate on academic work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I strongly agree with the idea of non-academic

subjects

,

such

as physical

education

and cookery, because children can be less stressed and

therefore

focus and succeed more on other academic

work

.

Firstly

, some people dislike the concept of non-academic courses so that the

child

can concentrate more on other academic

subjects

, but

this

leads the

child

to be under pressure.

For example

, physical and cookery

education

subjects

can be helpful for the student because there should be some other courses that differ from complex academic

subjects

that stress the

child

.

Also

, these physical

education

classes have a huge effect on students, because they can do sports and learn several new habits from these non-academic

subjects

.

Secondly

,

although

the student should succeed academically, putting the

child

under too much stress and pressure from

school

can affect his or her educational level ending up not being satisfied with

school

academic

work

.

In addition

, these days schools should be aware of letting the

child

choose whatever he likes in non-academic

subjects

.

Such

as, students should have the total freedom to select courses like cookery and physical

education

so that they can be successful in both academic and non-academic

subjects

. In conclusion, there is a wide variety of people with different opinions about the student's academic

work

, whether to remove non-academic

subjects

from the

school

syllabus or to indicate them. Some people think that these activities distract the

child

from concentrating on

school

work

, but

then

the

child

will be under too much pressure.