Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.  To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Nowadays the states tend to contribute more money to road development rather than the rail industry.in my view ,
such
Linking Words
a system would only harm humanity's lives and the government's budget respectively. The first aspect to point out is that investments in
roads
Use synonyms
are decreasing the chance of reconsidering the means of travel.
In other words
Linking Words
,by paying less attention to rail amelioration people will use vehicles more,what factor is partly devastating.Despite the environmental harm of cars,individuals put themselves under threat of accidents as not all areas are provided with appropriate
roads
Use synonyms
.
For instance
Linking Words
,in Uzbekistan,distinct spaces in the countryside still have unsatisfactory quality routes.
Therefore
Linking Words
,
according to
Linking Words
statistics,the annual indexes of road disasters are not dwindling but vice versa are dramatically increasing
due to
Linking Words
the factor that cars are the most distributed kind of transportation.
Besides
Linking Words
the aspects of human factors, governments across the globe are in danger of a financial crisis connected with the transport sphere exclusively.The major reason is the number of vehicles which are promised to double in near decades.
Hence
Linking Words
, more money will be required only for routes and highway construction.Concerning railways,
in contrast
Linking Words
to
roads
Use synonyms
,their manufacture and as well maintaining
do
Change the verb form
does
show examples
not require enormous funds
whereas
Linking Words
roads
Use synonyms
are in need of regular repairs.
For example
Linking Words
,Tashkent
roads
Use synonyms
are frequently in demand of refreshments as the approach of their building
along with
Linking Words
materials are not enough dependable. At the same time,maintaining the railways in
this
Linking Words
country is quite a simple and non-expensive process.As proof,since the USSR time,rails are serving with no hints to be changed with fresher ones. In conclusion,If the power had paid more contributions for the rail field thriving,both mankind and the financial conditions would probably benefit.
Submitted by prostoy.pacan4ek on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: