Some think that people should not change their jobs while others think they should because it brings advantages for themselves, the company and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is sometimes argued that

employees

should work in the same companies,

while

many people believe that the changement of careers could bring more positive effects. In

this

paper, I will discuss both points of view in-depth and present examples to show why the latter assertion is correct. Those who advocate for unchanging

jobs

argue that having long-term

jobs

could bring

employees

sustainable salaries

as well as

welfare

such

as travelling each year and insurance.

In other words

, they can receive money without the anxiety of unemployment.

For example

, workers in company A could receive a salary from the 13th month and visit a randomly famous place every year.

Moreover

, working in a familiar company helps you feel easier with tasks because you met these difficulties many times and you will find suitable solutions with ease.

On the other hand

, proponents of changing

jobs

argue that individuals can transfer their work anytime, which means they could change their situations anytime if they feel uncomfortable and their

jobs

are non-promoted. For many people, working in new places may bring them enthusiasm and riskier that they have to work harder to have advancement in their

career

paths.

For example

, many

employees

retired from their old companies to become entrepreneurs to start up new ones. In conclusion, staying in the same

career

may lead to receiving sustainable profits,

however

, changing

jobs

make people feel riskier and have more chance to advance their

career

paths.

As a result

, I believe that varying

Fix the agreement mistake

careers

show examples

career

has many advantages for

employees

.