The best way to learn English is to learn it from a native speaker.

Some people argue that the most efficient method to study the

English

language

is to acquire it from a native speaker. I completely disagree with that statement and suppose that

however

a person who speaks from birth can be more experienced, somebody from the ‘outer circle’ has undergone more struggles learning and has more teaching experience. First of all,

non-native

teachers better understand grammar because they have learned it from their own mistakes.

For example

, it is very hard to dissuade someone that something he was believing for many years has been false.

Moreover

, native

speakers

often rely on their experience and intuition more than on the rules. No person is immune from making a mistake, and some people make errors especially when they believe their inner feelings more.

Secondly

, native

speakers

have a higher demand in the labour market, and it is obvious that some students choose a tutor not comparing his skills to other’s

non-native

ones, but merely because the first know

English

from his birth.

Furthermore

, the most advantages gain people who are studying with both, native and

non-native

speakers

. Representatives of the ‘inner circle’ may make many obvious mistakes because they are used to some constructions in everyday life.

However

,

non-native

speakers

sometimes tend to be hypercritical of the

language

.

To conclude

, I strongly believe that tutors to whom the

English

language

is

non-native

are more thorough,

as well as

they pay more attention to details.

However

, those mentors who speak the

English

language

from birth are often overestimated in the labour market,

although

they haven’t undergone so

much

Change the quantifier

many

show examples

efforts

Fix the agreement mistake

effort

show examples

, as their students do.