There is a view that suggests the attention of museums and
art
exhibitions should solely be drawn to the
artifactsChange the spelling
show examples
which represent their heritage rather than the
culture
of other nations. In my opinion, it is completely logical to assume that it would be better for them to do so.
From the perspective of some, learning about other cultures and
history
could be extremely useful. There exists a massive amount of lessons in other nations’
history
which could be found nowhere in ours, and
thus
, must be pore over and illustrated to people to stimulate the growth of our nation. The concept of secularism,
for example
, has been practised in the United States since its foundation, yet youngsters would not really understand the essence of it like their peers in the European countries where for a significant period of their
history
, Europeans had struggled with the intrusion of religion in the governance. Each nation should learn about other cultures
as well as
its own because it may involve new lessons.
I,
however
, feel that museums should concentrate on their own
culture
, as these illustrations would have the most impact on individuals and they would bring the most of it.
This
is simply
due to
the fact that individuals will essentially not only care more about their heritage than other countries but
also
know a much greater deal about its prior, so it would be easier to follow the possible storyline.
On the contrary
, the
artifactsChange the spelling
show examples
of others may feel tedious and strange since visitors know hardly a thing about them. Familiarity with
culture
can make it more interesting for museum and
art
gallery visitors to learn and be more effective.
Moreover
, it is suitable for these exhibitions to connect with each other and establish a more comprehensive network for
culture
vultures to follow. After learning about a historical event or artist’s work, a motivated person can easily see the relevant artefact in a nearby exhibition or can find them in a network of galleries conveniently. As a case in point, in the United States students learn about the civil war in their
history
books. The manifestation of
this
can be exploited in any museum and theme park near the corner,
whereas
the British revolution would not be properly illustrated in these exhibitions even if students were able to explore somewhere with the relevant
artifactsChange the spelling
show examples
. People can learn better about their
culture
and
art
because it is possible to observe them.
In conclusion, regardless of how some might feel, I’m convinced that museums and
art
galleries should concentrate on presenting
artifactsChange the spelling
show examples
of their own nation and heritage.