In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Some
people
support the idea of big investments in expanding new railroads for high-speed trains between cities.
In contrast
, some argue it should be funded to improve the existing transportation system. If we use an example from a developing
country
like Thailand, improving the original commune system is a better solution. In many developed countries, high-speed trains are already daily transportation tools.
For example
, Japanese
people
took Shinkansen, known as the bullet train, to work daily. Because developed countries already have efficient public transport systems, expanding new
routes
for fast trains became their current goal.
In contrast
, if we turn our focus to a developing
country
such
as Thailand, we will see a huge difference. Facing unpleasant traffic jams, Thai
people
really hope to reduce the time spent on the road as much as possible.
However
, Bangkok's subway or above-ground train is not yet well developed,
thus
, office workers choose to commute using private vehicles. From a developing
country
perspective, by increasing the number of
routes
and stations, commuters can travel conveniently. Because the originally constructed
routes
are already based on
people
's preferences, the government should pay for additional train route constructions, extend from the main one, and strengthen the existing system.
For instance
, the blue subway line in Bangkok is convenient for workers who work in the downtown area, but inconvenient for employees working in the suburban area, where there is no subway line. In conclusion, the importance of funding depends on the situation of that
country
. If it is a well-developed
country
, expanding new
routes
is better.
However
, if it is an under-developing
country
, strengthen existed transportation systems must be prioritised.
Submitted by purita.w on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: