Governments should spend tax money on public libraries rather than public transportation improvement. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Nowadays, numerous people realize the importance of

libraries

to their daily life and work.

As a result

, residents think their government should spend tax budget on public

libraries

rather than public means of

transportation

.

However

, in my viewpoint,

i

Change the capitalization

I

show examples

disagree with their opinion because of the On the one hand, public

libraries

bring local residents a large number of benefits

such

as silent places that help them more concentrate on working, or a vast area to finish group assignments.

Moreover

, they

also

are big data centres, because of the various books here,

therefore

humans often choose them to look up information for research.

For example

, my high school is beside a library,

hence

after my school, I go to one to study with my friends and discuss

about

Remove the preposition

apply

show examples

several problems in studying. I feel my efficiency in studying in

libraries

is much higher than in my house, and numerous kinds of research have the same conclusion.

Otherwise

, public

transportation

has significantly

contribute

Change the verb form

contributed

show examples

to saving driving time

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and reducing traffic jams. Developed countries are a good example of

this

statement, a huge number of public

transportation

like underground electrical trains, buses, etc help traffic jams can be seen in these countries. Another benefit of investment in public

transportation

is connecting rural areas with urban, which can make overpopulation go down, and people can work far from their houses.

To sum up

, both of them have different benefits,

thus

governments should consider cautiously to use of dweller tax efficiency and bring the greatest benefit possible.