Some people say that noise made by people should be strictly controlled while others say they should be free to make noise without limitation. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In some perspectives, restrictions regarding

noise

pollution

should be stringent,

while

others hold different opinions. The former suggests that

noise

will derive various negative effects, reversedly, the latter

believe

Correct subject-verb agreement

believes

show examples

it is the right of

humen

Correct your spelling

humans

to make sounds. 

To begin

with, I agree that it is necessary for a law forcing departments to stop the deterioration of

noise

pollution

since too much

noise

not only downgrades the quality of sleep, which will increase anxiety and cause mental illness in the long term but stimulate physical harm on young individuals .

For example

, in many big cities around the world,

noise

pollution

become a serious social issue, many statistics indicate a great number of residents in these areas suffer from depression caused by

such

problems,

nonetheless

, it will cause hearing problems and heart diseases.

Therefore

many specialists urge governments to make regulations to ensure a better living environment. 

On the other hand

, there are people who don't want to trade in the perks of commercial revenues since it could slow down the development of local economies. Considering that

such

rules may reduce working hours in construction industries, which will slow down the progress of cities. They believe there are other methods to reduce the influence of

noise

, including using better soundproof materials, compared to making harsh rules to keep people from making noises. 

To conclude

, despite that strict rules to prevent

noise

pollution

may cause drawbacks to the progress of local development, taking all the negative effects caused by

noise

into perspective, I agree that it is essential for correlative departments to reduce

noise

pollution

for the sake of public health.