Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying past history can help us better understand the present. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

So far,

history

has played an important role in making our society more civilized and advanced. It is debatable whether learning

history

is beneficial or futile. From my perspective,

while

the latter leads to several disadvantages, society would benefit tremendously thanks to the former. The following paragraphs would shed light on my viewpoint. Perhaps for many, learning

history

is unnecessary.

First,

the knowledge of

history

is no longer suitable for the modern public.

In particular

, the gap between

history

and modern life is too large, so individuals have difficulty applying the lessons of

history

to life.

Second,

for pupils,

history

is only treated as a secondary subject.

This

could be seen easily in learning natural science which has advantages in developing the career of students

instead

of spending much time to understand and remember historical facts. In reality, at high schools in VietNam, a significant number of pupils indicates that studying

history

is inapplicable to the variety of vacations. Despite the valid arguments detailed above, I believe that

history

is an essential course because of two primary reasons. The most pertinent point is that

history

is of paramount importance in the culture and tradition of each nation. Specifically,

this

endows pupils with an overview of the past and understand clearly about the current situation. In fact, the One Pillar pagoda, one of the well-known historical sites in Viet Nam,is not only a beautiful piece but

also

a symbol of the unique culture of Vietnamese citizens. Another justification is that learning

history

ameliorates a significant number of essential skills in daily life. To be specific, when studying

history

, undergraduates have to do research and present complicated problems and past mistakes, which helps them avert adversity and enhance their presentation skills. In conclusion, it is disputable that learning

history

is no longer appropriate for a significant number of professions and the development of society.

Nonetheless

, I still strongly agree with the first standpoint thanks to its conductive impacts on the insights and skills of undergraduates.