Some people think it is better for one single legal system throughout the world. Others say countries should have their own law. Discuss both view and give your opinion .

One of the most controversial issues today relates to whether a common policy or national

own

Correct word choice

apply

show examples

law is better.

However

, I would argue that each country has its own policy rules. In

this

essay, I am going to examine

this

question from both points of view. On one side of the

argument

Add a comma

argument,

show examples

there are people who

believed

Wrong verb form

believe

show examples

that the benefits of one single legal system considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The paramount reason is that a public system acts as a precursor to an outgoing relationship among all countries around the world.

For example

,

Russia

Correct article usage

the Russia

show examples

– Ukraine War might have been prevented if the world had only a legal network.

Moreover

, it takes against racism and discrimination which is a significant problem.

On the other hand

, it is

also

possible to make an opposing case. Each country has its own puzzle so they need an independent structure to solve it.

For instance

, Vietnam is facing a high proportion of traffic accidents.

Likewise

, Thailand is confronted with social evils

such

as robbers.

In addition

, every country has a story, its own culture or even a victorious past which is the pride of citizens.

Accordingly

, a disparate law stems from the foundation of encouraging citizens to protect their history, liberty and tranquil atmosphere. In conclusion, there are no easy answers to

this

question. On balance,

however

, I tend to believe that a single legal system is not an excellent solution. Every nation needs to enact its own law in order to protect its

right

Fix the agreement mistake

rights

show examples

and citizens.