The government has the responsibility to ensure the safety of its citizens. Therefore, some people think that the government should increase spending on defense but spend less on social benefits. To what extent do you agree?

Some people think that the government is highly responsible for ensuring the safety of the people in its own

country

and

while

speaking on

this

opinion they offer the solution by increasing the expenditure on defence

instead

of social

benefits

. In my personal opinion, I do not entirely agree with

this

statement. First of all, providing social

benefits

is the most direct and important way to support one's

country

's

citizens

. To be more specific, social

benefits

can include health insurance, children's school fees, free means of transportation, allowances for unemployed people and so on.

Therefore

, cutting down

that

Change preposition

on that

show examples

kind of spending or lacking basic support can lead to an unbalanced society and many social problems even so. The truth is that the safety of a

country

is

also

the safety of its

citizens

,

however

, there are many ways to ensure a

country

's stability.

For example

, a government's political views and skills in communicating with other countries are

also

key factors to protect the

country

and maintain peace without any defence or violent weapons involved. In reality, there are many safe and peaceful countries even when they do not spend a ton of money on the army and defence.

On the other hand

, a good and supportive government should be able to balance its own expense distribution, whether it is on social aid or protecting the

country

.

As a result

, living in a comfortable society can boost the

citizens

' motivation to work and develop their homeland situation. In conclusion, I personally think that not any of

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

governments should spend less on social

benefits

for their

citizens

.