Students in schools and universities learn more from their teachers than through other means such as the Internet, libraries, and TV. To what extent you agree or disagree?

There is a discussion that the best method for pupils to learn conveniently is teachers rather than using other means like cyberspace, book treasures and television. I totally concur with

this

notion

due to

the fact that it is an easy source of learning

as well as

saving their time.

To begin

with, learning lessons from tutors is more efficient than other sources since it is a straightforward method. What I mean by

this

is that students are used to the conventional educational structures since childhood and many learners have no access to the internet or other facilities.

Thus

, schools are the easiest way for learning.

For example

, science topics can be easily learnt from teachers than using online searching,

according to

Harvard

University

Change noun form

University's

show examples

pedagogical ways magazine.

Secondly

, why I agree with

this

statement that pupils learn more from teachers than

Internet

Correct article usage

the Internet

show examples

because it restrains their study time. Many students spend a huge part of their day searching different topics on cyberspace but they do not get any genuine articles related to and ultimately they could not prepare properly for their assignments, exams etc. The best example would be that there are more than 2 million websites for medical courses of which 10% provide real content with the remaining

are

Unnecessary verb

apply

show examples

partially or fully misguided.

To sum up

, I support

this

saying that the learners learn more from the trainers than other sources

such

as utilizing hyperspace, library and TV since it is a simple way and

also

consumes less time. I personally feel that authorities need to provide the latest technological sources to every institute so that students can learn the university things easier.