Governments should spend money on rai/ways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

There are plenty of steps that the should government do in order to develop infrastructure. Having taken other solutions into consideration, I,

however

, agree that government should spend the budget on

railways

as a better solution rather than roads.

To begin

with, nowadays, most of the people who lived in the city used their own

cars

to commute on a daily basis because of the lack of public

transportation

such

as

railways

.

For example

, there are no

railways

near their home. If

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

most people commute short distances by using their own

cars

, congestion will happen everywhere.

Furthermore

, using trains as mass

transportation

brings plenty of benefits for us

such

as being on time because the schedule has been fixed, and spared from the traffics.

On the other hand

, when

railways

become more, it affects

decline

Correct article usage

the decline

show examples

in using their own

cars

so that the carbon dioxide emissions

also

decrease.

As a result

, the city becomes greener. Meanwhile, using trains for mass

transportation

is cheaper than using their own

cars

to do activities.

For example

, people only paid for the ticket for using trains,

while

they have to pay tolls, and fuel for using their own

cars

.

Moreover

,

railways

also

have afterwards

such

as connecting all the areas and are very practical for daily use.

To conclude

, governments should spend more budgets on

railways

because of the many benefits of these steps, which are a decline in congestion, on time, very practical

transportation

, and

last

but not least it will reduce carbon dioxide emissions and the city will greener.

Furthermore

,

this

step is a must to do for government to make better development.