Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources (internet or television). To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is believed that
professors
provide
learners
with more knowledge than multimedia. From my perspective,
this
opinion is reasonable to a certain extent, and I will give my detailed explanation in the following paragraphs. It is acknowledged that there are several reasons why individuals oppose
learners
absorbing more information in traditional
classes
. First of all, pupils are able to study a lot of major subjects because of the flexible schedule. Specifically, online learning
classes
supply teaching videos for
learners
, so they can acquire knowledge at any time which provides convenience for them. Better still, when students misunderstand insights, they are likely to watch clips many times, which is unfeasible on campus.
Secondly
, the cost of online learning is lower than that of traditional
classes
. To be particular, undergraduates enrol for lessons in different parts of the globe without travelling and accommodation costs. In fact, a Vietnamese student can have access to the lectures of
professors
at Harvard, the world's best university.
However
, supporters of
this
view
also
have their reasons.
Firstly
, teachers are appropriate for
learners
lacking self-discipline. To be specific, educators can directly support pupils, who are accustomed to procrastination and concentration, by monitoring them continuously in the classroom.
As a result
,
this
ensures the assignment submission progress and understanding of
learners
and reduces their dropout in the long run.
Secondly
,
professors
can directly provide feedback for undergraduates in creative subjects. Specifically, in
classes
including arts and literature, each student’s work is unique, so an exact answer does not exist.
That is
why a human teacher is compulsory to assess
learners
’ works and appreciate the metaphorical elements in their products. In conclusion, opponents of the fact that lectures deliver more knowledge than multimedia believe that
learners
have a chance to experience more majors at a reasonable cost.
However
, I reckon that undergraduates absorb more information from their
professors
than other sources because teachers are suitable for students, especially in arts or literature
classes
.
Submitted by nttung.182 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: