Undeniable is the fact that going on strike has been a practical way for individuals in all sorts of occupations to show their dissatisfaction and demand their rights.
Nevertheless
, it is argued that some professionals should not be allowed to do Linking Words
this
. From my perspective, Linking Words
this
point of view sounds more logical Linking Words
due to
the reasons that will be explained.
On one hand, going on strike has been known as a strong tool that allows employees to convey their objections to authorities and those who contribute to their current issues. To clarify, having irreparable damages and long-haul consequences, Linking Words
this
action is Linking Words
so
likely to give the answer to the strikers. Rephrase
apply
Hence
, all employees have the right to refuse to work so as to achieve their desires. Linking Words
For example
, in a European ,country the pilots of an airline abandoned their jobs owing to their low salaries. Having been shut down for a Linking Words
while
, the ones who were in charge had to accept their request.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, some occupations Linking Words
such
as police officers, firefighters or professions related to health care are considered not to be given the right to quit working even for a short time. To explain, One reason is that they have heavy responsibilities and play a significant role in people's lives. Linking Words
therefore
, should they quit their jobs, it ends with critical consequences and can put their folk in high potential danger. Linking Words
For instance
, if surgeons leave their jobs, they can claim lots of lives
Linking Words
To sum up
, Linking Words
although
striking can be highly helpful and make a way to reach the demands, some professionals should turn a blind eye to it. I believe governments should pay attention and fulfil their desires so they do not think of Linking Words
this
as a way.Linking Words
davoudim78