The government should spend money on promoting sports and art in schools, rather than sponsoring Professional sports and art events in communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often thought that the

government

ought to spend money on making

events

which are related to

art

and

sport

in school, rather than make it for the communities. I totally agree that the state should make the

sport

and

art

events

for the

society

because

this

will include the majority of the community and

this

may make the

society

avoid

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

harmful things to their health. First of all, the state should provide the money

that is

needed to develop

art

and

sports

events

for the communities in order to benefit them.

In other words

, when

government

concentrates on making arts

events

in

society

,

this

may make the opportunity higher to discover talented people in

this

society

like an artist.

In addition

, more professionals may appear in the

sports

field through construction stadiums and

also

training camps that are needed to train them to be an athlete.

Secondly

, the

government

has to focus more on promoting

art

and

sport

in the communities because

this

may prevent them from having bad habits

such

as smoking and drug abuse. If there are any

events

that attract the attention of

society

, especially young people,

this

may not give them a chance to think about going in the wrong direction or have some bad habit,

such

as drug abuse.

Furthermore

,

sports

and

art

events

are a good chance to aware people of the damages and the problems that are related to drugs and

also

they can tell them the advantages of being a

sports

player or a dancer.

To conclude

, I strongly believe that

government

should pay money to promote

art

and

sport

in the community rather than a school because

this

will cover most of

society

and will make it cleaner of drugs