A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people while others argue that humands must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is often argued that

animals

should not be exploited by city dwellers.

However

, some populace argued that the general public must

use

beasts

to overcome their distinct

requirements

such

as

food

and

research

.

This

essay will intend to analyse both opinions in detail with relevant examples.

However

, I believe that creatures should not be misused by the general public. On the one end,

due to

animals

exploitations, most

animals

are on the verge of getting extinct.

In other words

, by virtue of animal hunting and clearing of forests, the total figures of

beasts

are reducing at an alarming rate.

For example

, The latest survey by the "The Times of India" reveals that 60% of creatures have been extinct in India

due to

the regular hunting and clearing of forests.

Therefore

, in my opinion, the masses should start preserving

animals

.

On the other hand

, some conservationists proposed that the general public must

use

beasts

to overcome their distinct

requirements

such

as

food

and

research

. The majority of human

requirements

such

as

food

, milk, and medicine totally dependent on

beasts

.

For instance

, recent

research

by "Oxford University" claims that 30% of the UK economy depends on the products manufactured by

animals

. That's why, the masses should

use

beasts

to overcome their distinct

requirements

. In conclusion,

animals

should not be overused by the general public.

whereas

, some populace advise that the general public must

use

beasts

to overcome their distinct

requirements

such

as

food

and

research

. From my point of view, creatures should not be misused by the general public.