Many people believe that "pen and paper" examinations are not the best methods of assessing educational achievement.what is your view of examinations?

It seems to me that "pen and paper" experiments can not help

students

in academic progress.

Also

, most people think that "pen and paper"

tests

are not good models for estimating instructional accomplishment. I will consider and explain why in

this

essay. On the one hand, every student has different skills to test. Since some of them are good at written

tests

but others are good at oral

tests

.

For instance

, If teachers just use written exams maybe other learners are better at answering oral exams and they can not write answers to questions. One of the other significant factors is the

students

feeling about the exams. Sometimes written experiments have more effective feels on pupils. In short, when

students

begin

tests

some of them get nervous, and they are afraid to take an exam. These conditions lead to the loss of their concentration.

As a result

, they can not take a good examination and they fail. It is true that written experiments are the best manner of appraising course progress.

That is

, the learners have enough time to answer questions and they do not get stressed. Despite

this

, every student has specific conditions to achieve a score

therefore

teachers should find suitable approaches to measure trainees' ability for testing.

Therefore

it is vital to find the best way of examining

students

according to

their talents and abilities.a

To conclude

, written

tests

and oral

tests

are good curricula for scholars to assess during the semesters. As

also

, every student sits an exam

according to

their skill, so teachers should identify

students

which

Correct pronoun usage

who

show examples

one is better at written

tests

or oral

tests

.