Many people think that the government should spend more money on providing faster means of public transport. Some others think that there are important priorities(e.g.cost, environment). Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people support the idea that the government should increase amounts of money on providing faster means of public

transport

, but other people are against

this

idea because of the significant primaries.

This

discussion has some misunderstood aspects

such

as faster means of public

transport

cause various issues for societies and natural life. To make it clear, costs and environmental effects are some of the most crucial subjects of

this

discussion. Costs are one of the main problems in

this

situation because faster cars, trains and other

transport

create more production money, energy cost, and employment. To make it clear, companies or governments that manage public

transport

spend more money on not only providing

vehicles

but

also

workers and energy. As an illustration, if one firm chooses to provide faster

vehicles

, they must hire more personnel

such

as managing new systems, and users of

vehicles

and it will create a massive budget for them.

On the other hand

, the health of nature is a critical worry for almost every person and faster public

transport

is influencing global warming and other dangerous activities.

Additionally

, faster

transport

is causing more energy consumption than the others.

Consequently

, these facets show us new

vehicles

create more pollution of air, water, and forest.

For instance

, experts published new research about that, and it demonstrates that faster transportation ways damage the human habitat and natural life. In conclusion, providing faster means of public

transport

has fewer positive parts and more efficient and impactful drawback features in there. In my opinion,

this

type of idea will harm numerous areas of our globe and humanity.