The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens’ health rather than on protecting the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent days, pollution is increasing
then
it causes plenty of issues for
people
’s health. Most countries are attempting to cure problems by improving the
environment
as well as
inventing new kinds of pharmacies. From my perspective, I am totally against investing the budget in medical
research
instead
of sheltering the
environment
and suppose that they should balance the budget. On the one hand, medical treatment should be spent on because of its significance. Now,
people
must put up with a variety of diseases which are dangerous;
therefore
, they need pharmacies to protect themselves. Especially, when citizens face new types of bacteria, national authorities need to conduct
research
immediately to find out methods or drug treatments.
For example
, in Covid19-pandemic, most countries had to
research
and create vaccines to help their residents resist
this
tough period. Unless
governments
research
vaccines, deaths could not be reduced and
people
could not continue their work.
On the other hand
, the capital of environmental protection should be injected by virtue of its well-being merits.
Governments
should spend their money on environmental upgrades since a green
environment
can boost
people
’s health.
Moreover
, not only can
people
live under the good qualities of the
environment
but
also
immerse themselves in nature. In fact, improving habitats can prevent a lot of bad diseases causing harmful results to
people
’s health.
For instance
, higher temperatures is causing the melting of ice leading to the bleeding of millions of bacteria and it brings a huge amount of pathogens for
people
.
Hence
, the leaders of nations try their best to seek solutions that can fight against
this
phenomenon. In conclusion, if
governments
just spend their money on medicines and neglect environmental improvements, hardly can
people
ensure their development.
Therefore
,
governments
should strike a balance between medicine and environmental preservation.
Submitted by maianhdt12 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • moral obligation
  • advanced treatments
  • economic benefits
  • workforce
  • healthcare costs
  • pollution
  • climate change
  • comprehensive benefits
  • investment
  • global sustainability
  • long-term health security
  • disease proliferation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: