In modern society, there is a disagreement about the issue of whether
should learn
byChange preposition
show examples
secondary sources
as
and
rather than real-life
. I personally believe that encouraging young
to have real-life
is more beneficial than reading
or watching
in
's learning process.
with, it is commonly believed that having real-life
from an early age would give an opportunity to young
to gain useful life lessons that they can never have by reading
or watching
.
, an educational study shows that high school students who have part-time jobs are more likely to continue better spending habits into adulthood than students who do not work because they would learn the value of money
earning money by themselves.
shows that
in realityAdd the comma(s)
show examples
are much more useful than secondary sources since
provide life-long knowledge that could give guidance to young
to be well-rounded adults.
, another factor that makes real-life
more valuable than
and
is that
can teach students the importance of cooperation in society. It is undeniable that adolescents can learn a wide range of knowledge or information through reading
or watching
, but
material cannot provide any opportunity to learn how to socialize with other
.
, many educational experts point out that
who have only focused on traditional learning methods like reading
in school might have difficulties
to getChange the verb form
show examples
involved in a group or community
a lack of cooperation skills.
, it is crucial for young
to have real-life
as attending speaking contests and group discussion classes as it is much helpful to get
other
in the future.
In conclusion, it is heavily discussed regarding young
's education methods in many societies. There are some
who argue that secondary sources would bring about many beneficial outcomes in
's academic performance, but I strongly believe that the advantages of real-life
indeed outweigh
and
.