The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming. To what extent do you agree?
It is a fact that global warming poses a serious threat to our planet, and urgent action is required to mitigate its effects. From my personal point of view, I totally disagree that reducing funding for local environmental problems is the solution.
Besides
, I give some concrete answers to prove why the government should allocate funds for both global and local environmental issues.
To begin
with, local environmental quality has a direct impact on people’s health and well-being. Indeed, if numerous natural consuming
daily is extremely poisonous, people are the direct victims of Replace the word
consumption
this
consequence. For instance
, air pollution, contaminated water, and hazardous waste can cause respiratory diseases, cancer, and other health harms. Therefore
, eliminating the budget for local environmental complications will jeopardize the health of the public and may lead to severe results.
Secondly
, regional ecological issues can have a ripple effect on the environment globally. Particularly, logging forests by private businesses in some developing countries depletes natural resources day by day, directly impacting the ozone layer. For instance
, deforestation in the Amazon rainforest can contribute to global warming, as trees absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Accordingly
, it is essential for governments and private companies to take a more proactive approach to addressing regional ecological issues, such
as implementing sustainable forest management practices and promoting conservation efforts.
In conclusion, while
climate change around the world is a critical issue that requires urgent attention, reducing funding for local environmental outcomes is not an alternative. Hence
, the government should allocate funds for both global and local environmental problems to ensure the well-being of the public and the planet.Submitted by joseph.bachle on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
Your essay addresses the prompt by discussing the importance of funding for both global and local environmental issues. You have provided relevant examples to support your points, showing a clear understanding of the topic. However, you should consider discussing the opposing view to present a balanced argument.
coherence cohesion
Your essay demonstrates good coherence and cohesion. The logical structure of your essay is clear and easy to follow. Your introduction and conclusion effectively summarize your main points. To further enhance coherence, consider using transition words and phrases to connect ideas more explicitly within paragraphs.