Every country should have a free health service even if this means the latest medical treatment may not be available through the service because they are too expensive. To what extent do you agree or disagree

The issue of whether the
government
should pay for healthcare expenditures to their citizens, no matter how much the medication cost is, has long been controversial.
Although
it is obvious that a large proportion of the population may not have enough money to secure
health
problems, I believe that some of them, but not all, are still able to pay for themselves, as the huge demand for
health
expenses imposed a heavy burden on society. On one hand,
it is clear that
everyone should be born equal, regardless of their family and financial background, they should be able to enjoy complete medication if they got sick. For some undeveloped countries, there is always news stating that people in poverty with simple illnesses died because of insufficient
government
support and delayed treatment because of lacking money, where they have to borrow money from their relatives and neighbours. If the authority did provide subsidies to public
health
, the problem would have been alleviated.
On the other hand
, public funds should be made use of effectively and wisely. As they came from taxpayers, the
government
should exert itself to improve the quality of living, which is not solely focused on the healthcare system. Other than medical welfare, other needs
such
as national security and education are
also
important for a country to function properly. The
government
should allocate resources fairly,
for instance
, the rich who can afford their medical expenditures should pay for themselves.
Otherwise
, the financial burden would be too heavy if the
government
provide free treatment to all their citizens.
To conclude
, the issue of public
health
is of paramount importance that the
government
should take into account all aspects to deal with. I do not agree that people in all countries should have free
health
services, not only would it impose a financial burden on the
government
, but it would
also
lead to a lack of focus on other essential public needs.
Submitted by noname on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: