Some people believe that governments should ban dagerous sports even though other claim they should have the freedom to choose a sports to their liking and disliking. To what extent do you agree or disagree. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

Few individuals opine that games that are life-threatening ought to be banned by authorities.

However

, others ponder that every person has their own liking

as well as

dislikes to choose the sport without any intervention. I largely agree with the primary notion and I will discuss reasons why I support the notion in the upcoming paragraphs. To commence with the view of disagreement that few people are proponents of, there is no restriction cap put on the dangerous competitions

instead

of government should totally open its gate to everyone.

Moreover

, They think that dangerous sports are more economical than sensitive competitions. Folks are more enthusiastic to see adventure games.

For example

, the Bullfighting game is very famous and harmful that has been played in Spain for the

last

thousands of years

as well as

the government of Spain never think about stopping it because it provides economic strength to their nation via tourism. Shifting toward the view of agreement that the harmful competition that even sometimes becomes the cause of death should be restricted by the government. To elaborate on

this

, young people who are under nineteen do have not any specific knowledge about sport. If they join the harmful games without any professional training it may cause injurious to them, in some cases the consequence is death.

For instance

, scuba diving well as paragliding has been declared contraband

due to

their harmful effects on players in India.

As a result

, without any proper training adventurous sports may prove life-threatening. Taking everything into consideration,

although

, horrific results can be seen in dangerous sports yet, They can be executed perfectly with adequate Practice.