it is too expensive to look after and repair old building. This money should be spent on building modern building instead. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is believed by some people that preserving ancient
buildings
is more costly rather than creating modern buildings
such
as skyscrapers. I certainly disagree with this
statement because there are several benefits to taking care of the heritage building, such
as becoming a tourist place an
Correct your spelling
and
education
Replace the word
educational
purpose
. I will elaborate more on my point of view below.
Preserving heritage Fix the agreement mistake
purposes
building
by the government should be embraced in many countries because it creates new economic activities. Fix the agreement mistake
buildings
To begin
with, a
more ancient Correct article usage
apply
buildings
which came from the medieval era should be well maintained, by doing Correct the article-noun agreement
building
this
, it could be a great tourist place and attract visitor
to come, as a ,result Fix the agreement mistake
visitors
local
economy business will be increased and possibly become a good income for local communities by selling merchandise or being a local guide. Another benefit, Add an article
the local
this
can be an educational centre of history subjects for students, thus
the students could take a lesson learned about culture and identity. For instance
, Edinburgh is one of the popular cities which preserved a medieval building for attracting visitors to come to Scotland and earn a big money from tourism.
On the other hand
, some countries prefer to build new buildings
because they want to be known as a modern city. Firstly
, progressive architecture such
as skyscrapers is made because of land availability in metropolitan cities. Besides
, a tall building is more expensive caused of it should be equipped with high-safety equipment and structured to prevent casualties from earthquake hazard
. Fix the agreement mistake
hazards
In addition
, modern buildings
only have a short lifetime around 25 to 30 years compared to old
building have 100 to 500 years old. Add an article
the old
Thus
, they do not have something uniqueness
which obligated the authorities to preserve it in the long run.
To summarise, Replace the word
unique
although
some countries prefer more budget to build e new modern buildings
, preserving old architecture
Replace the word
architectural
buildings
has lots of benefits for local businesses and education learning. Therefore
, I strongly disagree with the statement above.Submitted by conk.addict on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
