Rich contries often give money to poorer contries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Developed

countries

help to not developed

countries

by giving them money, but in ,reality it is not the solution to the problem.

However

, rich

countries

should provide them with different kinds of help

instead

of financial aid.

To begin

with, the most important feature of rich

countries

is valuable education. The majority of poor nations do not have access to good studies, and

this

is the key to success.

For instance

,

countries

such

as Brazil, India, Kenia etc. are suitable examples. And in these

countries

public schools even private schools can not provide well education.

Moreover

, some teachers do not have enough knowledge to tutor students. Perhaps, the best way to help poor

countries

is by providing better schools and developing the education

systemon

Correct your spelling

system

system on

,

consequently

Add a comma

,consequently

show examples

they can advance their

countries

.

On the other hand

on some occasions, financial aid might be helpful. Governments can use the support from other

countries

to renovate their economy, infrastructure even they can restore their

countries

from catastrophe or war.

For example

,nowadays Ukraine

use

Change the verb form

uses

show examples

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

money from their allies to rebuild their cities after the war with Russia. In conclusion, rich

countries

can either help with finance or fix the issue of poverty with another kind of helps and both ways of solving the problem are good and have a lot of advantages but I think the second approach is more suitable for poor

countries

because dishonest authorities can use the financial help in improper way.