Many major cities are facing a housing crisis as they cannot provide enough land for new buildings. Some local governments believe the problem could be solved by reassigning park land for residential development, because this land would be better used for housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Urban migration is causing extreme pressure on housing and infrastructure and,
consequently
, some people feel that public
parks
have become a luxury that we can no longer afford.
While
it is true that green areas can take up a lot of space, the
benefits
to the residents of a
city
and to the environment are too numerous to ignore. It is undeniable that
parks
provide valuable leisure amenities – a place to picnic, walk, kick a ball, play with the children, or just relax.
Besides
this
, recent research has shown that they
also
provide appreciable health
benefits
by allowing people to engage with nature, which enhances their mental well-being and lowers their stress levels. Consider
also
that, with the rising epidemic of obesity, it is more important than ever to make space available for physical exercise. The bonus of exercising in a natural setting, rather than going to a gym or jogging on urban streets, is that not only does the body benefit from the physical activity but anxiety and depression are alleviated as well. It is reported that the
overall
effect of “green exercise” is better fitness, lower blood pressure, lower cholesterol levels and greater tranquillity.
Moreover
, for lower socio-economic groups,
parks
are an affordable way to improve health and participate in social interaction.
City
planners should
also
consider environmental
benefits
before deciding to sacrifice parkland for construction. Trees improve air quality by removing pollutants and filtering the air.
Furthermore
, if
parks
are located alongside urban waterways, they help keep the water clean by absorbing contaminated runoff from the
city
’s hard surfaces. In conclusion,
although
I appreciate the problem, I wholeheartedly disagree with the view that
parks
should be used to mitigate housing shortages in cities. They offer significant health and recreation
benefits
to the people and improve the
overall
climate and environment of the
city
. If space is truly at a premium,
city
officials would do better to look at reducing the urban sprawl of shopping malls and parking lots.
Submitted by amramer2344 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • housing crisis
  • residential development
  • reassigning park land
  • green spaces
  • recreational activities
  • mental well-being
  • ecological balance
  • environmental consequences
  • supporting biodiversity
  • high-rise apartments
  • vacant lots
  • repurposing industrial areas
  • community opposition
  • social unrest
  • quality of life
  • urban planning
  • sustainable development
  • integrating green spaces
  • preservation
  • communal spaces
What to do next:
Look at other essays: