International marketing is sometimes seen as invasive and an intrusion into the country in question. Others argue that it is a necessary and economical form of education in addition to spreading ideas, language and culture. Discuss both views and then give your opinion

The

growth

of overseas companies in the country become a debatable reason for taking the place of the

nation

's own

products

.

However

, some minds claim that with the invasion of these marketing, the

growth

and development of the

nation

by exchanging ideas, language and

culture

overseas. I personally agree with the latter aforementioned statement.

To begin

with, disturbing the public by least using their own

nation

's made product. By manufacturing foreign

products

in local areas, people attract to Western countries'

products

.

For example

, with the expansion of foreign factories, people prefer these

products

instead

of local

products

which causes loss to local companies and shopkeepers.

Thus

, it intrudes into the country.

Additionally

, sometimes people prefer Western

culture

to their own

culture

. Moving to the benefits of overseas manufacturing, it increases the economic

growth

of the countries by expanding their business between them. To illustrate

this

, India imports electric machinery, crude petroleum and so on and exports jewellery, pharmaceutical

products

and many more to other countries.

Moreover

,

this

business between the different nations enhances their friendship and a peaceful environment between these nations which leads to minimising chances of war between them. Eventually, the mingling of

culture

and language and exchanging of ideas happens only in international business by which the hope for the

growth

of the

nation

is for sure.

To conclude

, there is no doubt, that international marketing may hurt local businesses

nonetheless

cons are more for the acceleration of the production of the country which we can't unsee.