People should be at least 21 years old before they are allowed to drive a car. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Some say that the minimum

age

to

drive

a four-wheeler should be 21. I strongly agree with

this

statement because they would be more mature

thus

they would not do reckless driving , and there would be fewer cases of road

accidents

due to

underage drivers. People normally become mature at the

age

of 21

years

,

therefore

, they would not do rash driving.

In other words

, most cases of driving in reckless manners are the result of teenagers as they have less knowledge of driving, and they are more energetic

due to

which they

drive

fast.

For example

, in New Delhi, teenagers do rash driving during the weekend which ultimately disturbs the public.

Therefore

, I strongly agree that the minimum

age

should be increased to 21

years

for driving a car.

Further

, allowing to

drive

a four-wheeler above the

age

of 21

years

would cause fewer

accidents

.

That is

to say, people above the

age

of 21

years

drive

carefully with

following

Wrong verb form

follow

show examples

all traffic rules,

therefore

, there would be fewer cases of

accidents

.

For instance

, in India, more than half of

accidents

occur by adolescents since they do not follow traffic rules.

Hence

, I would agree that 21

years

should be the minimum

age

for driving a four-wheel automobile. In conclusion, I strongly agree that the minimum

age

to

drive

a car should be raised to 21

years

as the driver would be more mature

thus

they would not do rash driving, and there would be fewer

accidents

on roads by teenagers.