We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own countries or communities. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is a subject of debate whether our focus should be on caring for our own nations and societies before extending

assistance

to those around the world in need. I strongly agree that we should prioritize helping our own society primarily

due to

the simplicity of managing

donations

. One compelling reason to assist our nation first is the efficiency and ease of managing

such

aid.

For instance

, when the devastating Palu tsunami struck in 2018, numerous

donations

flooded into the refugee camps within days, and dedicated volunteers were swiftly deployed to the affected areas.

As a result

of

this

prompt response, Palu was able to recover and rebuild within a mere week.

This

example underscores the wisdom in concentrating our efforts on aiding those within our own nation. Another key consideration is that supporting other parts of the world is not always the optimal choice. Not only does it consume considerable time, but

also

involves significant effort in organizing the distribution of

donations

.

While

monetary contributions can be swiftly transferred via banking systems, ensuring that the intended recipients receive the

assistance

poses a challenge. In 2020, there were reports of

donations

to impoverished countries in Africa not being fully received

due to

the inadequate management of the donation programs.

Consequently

, it is far more effective to channel

assistance

to our immediate surroundings. In conclusion,

while

providing aid to the vulnerable is an act of kindness, it is preferable to prioritize our own society rather than extending

assistance

to other global communities

due to

the convenience and manageability of

such

contributions. By focusing on our nation

first,

we can respond swiftly and effectively to crises, and ensure that our

donations

reach the intended recipients.