In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Public transportation plays a vital role in modern society and the government should take it into consideration. In some countries, people including me believe investing in infrastructure for fast
trains
between cities is a must.
However
, others would argue that enhancing the current public
transport
systems is more important. In
this
,essay the importance of these both ideas will be discussed. Some folk hold the opinion that high-speed rails lead to economic growth and development.
For instance
, the Eurostar train connected London with other places like Paris and Brussels which has resulted in faster access to the market,and an increase in trade, tourism and business opportunities.
Moreover
, the existence of high-speed
trains
reduces travel time and
also
, creates a convenient and developing mode of transportation for passengers.
For example
, Japan has been revolutionized by speed
trains
that have connected major cities at speeds of up to 320 km/h.
Consequently
, in my opinion spending money on building fast lines ,especially for developed countries is necessary for seeking progress and economic advancement.
On the other hand
, public transportation which exists should be invested to create a better experience for commuters. To be more specific, investing in improving
this
measure like a transformation of London's public
transport
has led to encouraging more folk to use
this
system and reduced congestion and traffic jams in the city.
In addition
, public
transport
has positive environmental effects as it promotes a shift away from privet cars. In fact, greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution will reduce.
For example
, in Denmark cycling infrastructure has declined harmful emissions.
To conclude
,
although
some would believe that spending money on developing public
transport
should be considered by authorities, I am firmly certain that new lines for fast
trains
need to be constructed between cities to develop them.
Therefore
, fast
trains
make economic growth by improving connectivity and trade.
Submitted by mhshid on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: